Wednesday, February 26, 2014
Post 10: Book 3 Review
Book 3 Book Review
Where'd You Go Bernadette by Maria Semple
Room by Emma Donoghue
Where'd You Go Bernadette:Bernadette Fox (an antisocial, fiercely opinionated ex-architect) disappears from thin air... almost literally. Bernadette’s best friend, her practically genius 15-year old daughter Bee, will not rest until she is found. This all started when Bee asked to take a family trip to Antarctica after acing all of her classes. Bee is the perfect daughter and her parents could not deny her this wish. After this Bernadette begins acting strange, like falling asleep in public parks and spending all her time emailing her personal assistant who lives in India. Not understanding her actions, Bernadette’s husband, Elgin Branch, decides it is time for an intervention to get her help. During this intervention was when Bernadette disappeared in her own home. After extensive searches, Elgin just accepts that Bernadette must be dead (probably got too drunk and threw herself overboard) and Bee seems to be the only person who won't accept that her mother is gone.
Strengths & Weaknesses:
Where'd You Go Bernadette is written in documents and letters sent from person to person. This set-up of the novel keeps the reader on their feet when they are reading.
However, because the novel is written in letters when a new character is introduced it can take a while until you figure out how that character is and what connection they have to the story. This is because the character does not come out and say who they are in the letter; you have to connect all of the documents and letters.
Room:
Room is written from the perspective of a 5-year old boy who has never seen anything other than what is in Room. Whatever Jack sees on TV, he doesn't believe it's actually real (e.g. grass, dogs, etc.). Old Nick comes to bring Sunday Treat and "make the garbage disappear" but even Jack isn't sure if Old Nick is real. Jack's mom was kidnapped when she was 19 years old by Old Nick. Old Nick was Jack's father.
Strengths & Weaknesses:
This enitre book was creatively written from the perspective of a 5-year old boy, therefore the language of the book is that of a young child. When talking to his mother one morning Jack said, "Not-when you're on at the same time I'm off" (Donoghue 4). (By "on" and "off", Jack means being awake and asleep.)
Room is written from the perspective of a 5-year old boy who has never seen anything other than what is in Room. Whatever Jack sees on TV, he doesn't believe it's actually real (e.g. grass, dogs, etc.). Old Nick comes to bring Sunday Treat and "make the garbage disappear" but even Jack isn't sure if Old Nick is real. Jack's mom was kidnapped when she was 19 years old by Old Nick. Old Nick was Jack's father.
Strengths & Weaknesses:
This enitre book was creatively written from the perspective of a 5-year old boy, therefore the language of the book is that of a young child. When talking to his mother one morning Jack said, "Not-when you're on at the same time I'm off" (Donoghue 4). (By "on" and "off", Jack means being awake and asleep.)
![]() |
| This link takes you to see Jack's handwriting http://www.roomthebook.com/inside/about-the-book/ |
On her website Emma Donoghue described how she went about creating the language for the book, "Just as in previous novels I put
together a mini-dictionary of how people spoke in 1788 or 1864, this time I
made myself a dictionary of my son’s kid-English, then narrowed it down to some
classic errors and grammatical oddities that would not seriously confuse
readers" (Donoghue). http://www.roomthebook.com/inside/why-and-how/
By writing the book from Jack's perspective, the reader truly gets a sense of how innocent Jack is and how big the world seems from his eyes.
However, by the book being written from Jack's perspective, the reader only knows what Jack knows. This can lead to confusion throughout the book.
By writing the book from Jack's perspective, the reader truly gets a sense of how innocent Jack is and how big the world seems from his eyes.
However, by the book being written from Jack's perspective, the reader only knows what Jack knows. This can lead to confusion throughout the book.
Room vs. Where'd You Go Bernadette:
These two books are completely different genres, but at the
same time they also have many similarities. Room is literary fiction with
elements of suspense while Where'd You Go Bernadette is a comedy. Being two completely different genres does not stop these book from having significant similarities.
- Even though the two books are completely different genres they both have the similar plot line: someone going missing. In Room, Ma goes missing because she was kidnapped by Old Nick. In Where'd You Go Bernadette, Bernadette went missing after an intervention.
- Bee and Jack are also very similar characters (Both being the protagonists). Although both characters come from completely different places and have completely different backgrounds, they do have their similarities. Both characters are very intelligent for their age and both characters have a strong and indescribable connection to their mothers. In Where'd You Go Bernadette, Bee is determined to find her mother and will not believe that she is dead. Responding to her dad, Bee says about her mother, "She was my best friend" (Semple 287).
Is and Is Not's:
Room was not a story of Old Nick's evils or terrible actions, but it was the story of Ma and Jack pushing through the terrible conditions he put them through and joining the rest of society and their family. On her website, Emma Donoghue even stated, "It was not Old Nick's evil that fascinated me, but the resilience of Ma and Jack: the nitty-gritties of their survival, their trick of more or less thriving under apparently unbearable conditions."
Where'd You Go Bernadette is not a story of Bernadette's craziness but a story of the power of a mother-daughter relationship.
Thursday, February 13, 2014
Post 9: Heroes and Villains
Heroes and Villains
Room by Emma Donoghue
Where’d You Go, Bernadette by Maria Semple
In Room by Emma Donoghue, in my opinion
there are two protagonists; Jack and his mother. However the main one would be
Jack, a five year old boy who has never been outside Room. Jack has qualities from various archetypes for
heroes. At the beginning of the book, Jack’s main challenge was Old Nick. Old
Nick kidnapped his mother and kept them hidden in an old shack, so Jack had
never seen the outside world. After Jack and his mother figure out a plan to escape,
Jack’s new problem he has to face is fitting in with society. For the first
five years of his life the only person he had ever talked to was his mother and
he was not accustomed to typical societal norms.
In Room the antagonist is an old man who
Jack calls Old Nick. There is not enough background information given on Old Nick
to know if he follows the six stages of a villain. However he does follow some
of the stages in his own way. Stage 2 (obsession), he shows when he finds a way
to lure Jack’s mom, who he calls Ma, into his truck. He is very isolated form the rest of the world
and has a 14-foot fence around his backyard so no one can see in. This follows
Stage 4, isolation. Old Nick defiantly follows Stage 6 (cruelty/wickedness)
because how inhumane he treats Jack and Ma by keeping them hostage.
In Where’d You Go, Bernadette the clear
protagonists is Bee, who once her mother goes missing would set off to find
her. Bee is the epitome of a daughter: with perfect grades and an unbeatable
drive to do her absolute best. Bernadette, her mother, is an antisocial, ex-architect
who had her only masterpiece ruined in just a couple of hours. Bee’s father
works for Microsoft and absolutely loves his job. Bee and Jack are very
different: Bee fits perfectly into society and in her school while Jack is
struggling to understand what to do and what not to do in society.
There
is no clear antagonist at the moment in Where’d
You Go, Bernadette. Bernadette Fox often butt-heads with Audrey Griffin,
her neighbor who has a son that goes to Bee’s school. There is not really enough
information about Audrey yet to know if she is the only antagonist, but there
are a couple of encounters between Bernadette and Audrey. For example Audrey
claims Bernadette ran over her foot with her car while Bee claims that Audrey
was not even close to the car. Sunday, February 9, 2014
Post 8: Truth in Memior
In my opinion, “half-truths” can still be considered a good story; however the story is no longer a memoir or non-fiction. Of course if an author is trying to recollect a specific dialogue that occurred when he/she was five years old, the author will not be able to rewrite word for word exact what was said- but as long as the main idea of the conversation remains the same and no significant things were add, I think that conversation and book could still be considered non-fiction. However changing large details within a story to make it more interesting no longer makes the story non-fiction and I think the author should definably tell the readers the story has be altered. If I found out that Aron Ralston didn’t really cut off his arm and someone came save him but he changed those details in his book Between a Rock and a Hard Place to make it more interesting, then I would no longer find the book as inspiring as it was before. I think we do need labels between Fiction and Non-Fiction because a miraculous story has even more value if it truly occurred the way the author wrote it. So if an author wants to bend the truth to tell their story, they should be able to, however their story should no longer be labeled as non-fiction.
Monday, January 27, 2014
Post 6: "Readicide"
"Readicide"
I do think Readicide is a problem at schools, not
necessarily because of the specific books that are picked, but the assignments
that go along with the book. I feel like many times, teachers are hoping that students
find all the tiny details and students are often missing the big picture of the
book. I think books can send different messages to people and teachers seem to
be looking for one specific message, missing what it might send to each
student. I know I have often wondered what the point of a specific worksheet
was because I saw no relevance to the book.
I completely agree that the books studied at school should
be half literary fiction and half commercial fiction. I think teachers should
teach half and half because not only to students tend to enjoy commercial
fiction more, but now they will be more rounded in their knowledge of books. I
like when Kim Wright says “A good book is a good book. I’ve decided that genre
is strictly a marketing tool”. I feel like teaching books is being complicated by
arguing literary fictions vs. commercial fiction; teachers should just teach a
broad scope of books. I don’t necessarily think we should swap the classics for
modern books, but combine the two and broaden what books are taught. I agree
with Laura Miller: just being the book is “modern” does not mean important and
traditional “themes and wisdoms” cannot be taken out of it.
Sunday, January 26, 2014
Post 5: Silver Linings Playbook
Adapting My Book:
The knowledge of the reader is very limited when reading The Silver Linings Playbook. The reader
only knows what the narrator, Pat Peoples, knows. Pat was recently released
from a mental institution after he committed a crime that he forced himself to
forget. He believed he was only there for a couple of months when in fact he
was there for close to three years. Pat missed a lot of moments with his
family, the main one being his brother’s wedding. Missing out on so much but
not remembering how long he’d been gone caused confusion and frustration. This
causes confusion and frustration for Pat. The reader can empathize with Pat
because they too are often confused and unsure of why a character is acting a
certain way. When adapting this book, it may be hard to capture the same
feeling of not knowing what happened in the past.
Essential Scenes:
1.
In the middle of the book, Pat finds the “Pat
Box” in the attic. He does not confront his mother about the “Pat Box” until
later in the book, but he is always angry at him mom for not telling him about
this. Inside the “Pat Box” are the videos/pictures from Pat and Nikki’s wedding
which Pat was told were stolen. When Pat does ask his mom about the “Pat Box”
she just breaks down crying leaving Pat both angry and his mother and feeling
bad for her. This is the first time the reader is really given the chance to
see that something did go horribly wrong in order to cause apart time. Although
the reader still does not know what happened, they can see that something bad
must have happened for Pat’s mother to hide and lie about the wedding pictures.
2.
Tiffany tells Pat that she is willing help Pat
communicate with Nikki and if he agrees to be her dance partner and preform in
a dance recital. Pat agrees and they practice countless hours in Tiffany’s
dance studio and don’t stop until their routine is perfect. The actual dance
recital would be essential to show because first you would get to see the
moment that Tiffany and Pat worked tirelessly to perfect. Pat is also able to
get all of his friends and family (except for his dad) to come and watch them
dance. Pat sacrificed a lot for that moment, including watching or talking
about the Eagles and it was a moment when Pat and Tiffany were able to connect,
through dance.
3.
After writing fake letters pretending to be
Nikki, Tiffany messes up and gets Pat convinced that Nikki will meet him at La
Salle. When Pat arrives at La Salle and Nikki does not arrive, he begins to
pray and beg that she will come. After he prays he looks up to see Tiffany
standing before him apologizing. This is the moment the reader truly knows that
Nikki is never coming back and that Tiffany never actually contacted her. The
reader feels terrible for Pat because although they knew from the letters they
wrote to each other that Nikki was not actually going to show up, they did not
expect that Pat never got the chance to even communicate with Nikki. At this
moment the reader feels sympathy for Pat because he is unable to move on from
Nikki and is stuck in the past.
Scenes To Cut:
1.
Pat and his brother Jake, have season tickets to
the Eagles games which means they go to many, many games throughout the story.
Only a couple have events that are important to the story, such as Pat’s
encounter with the Giant’s fan, and scenes such as the “Asian Invasion” may
have to be cut. Although those scenes were nice to read, they do not actually
had to Pat’s story about his struggle to find Nikki and would not help the
story develop in a movie.
2.
Throughout the book, Pat has many therapy sessions
with his therapist, Dr. Cliff. It would take up too much time to show each
individual session even though most sessions have something that is important
to the story. In order to save time, producers would have to either cut the
therapy sessions completely, or they could cut each therapy session as to only mention
the important conversation needed to understand the plot and cut the ones that
do not give important information.
3.
Once getting in the mental health institute, Pat
devotes himself into getting physically fit. He works out for almost five hours
a day. It would be important to show one or two of his runs with Tiffany, but a
movie could not show every time he worked out because it would be tedious.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)




















